Hair Transplant, Hair Restoration & Repair
110 East 55th Street, New York, NY
Contact Us: 212-826-2400
 

Dr. Bernstein adds his expertise to a discussion on FUE vs. FUT hair transplant procedures that appeared in the September/October 2015 issue of Hair Transplant Forum International.


FUT should neither be considered the preferred hair restoration technique nor be deemed obsolete and abandoned. Both FUT and FUE are excellent techniques, but they have different clinical indications. In my opinion, to deliver the best care for our patients, hair restoration physicians should have expertise in both procedures, and they should offer both in their practices.

The main advantage of Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT) is that it typically (but not always) gives the highest yield of hair. Therefore, when the patient’s primary goal is to achieve maximum fullness, FUT should be performed. There are many well-described reasons for this, including the precision of stereomicroscopic dissection and the ability to efficiently harvest from a more select area of the donor zone, but these are beyond the scope of this brief commentary.

The main advantage of Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) is no linear scar. Therefore, when the patient’s primary goal is to be able to wear his hair very short, FUE should be performed. FUE is also indicated when there is an increased risk of a widened scar or when scalp laxity does not permit a strip excision. The patient may sometimes choose FUE simply to avoid the stigma of a linear donor scar.

There are situations in which both procedures are useful in the same patient. For example, FUT may first be used to maximize yield, but then, after several sessions, the scalp may become too tight to continue to perform FUT, or the donor scar may become wider than anticipated. In the former case, the physician can switch to FUE to obtain additional grafts; in the latter case, FUE may be used to camouflage the scar of the FUT procedure.

It is tempting to see the world in black and white, and it is easiest to learn and train one’s staff in just one hair transplant technique—but medicine is never so simple. Developments over the past 20 years have given us two excellent hair restoration procedures. We should offer our patients both.

See a detailed comparison of FUE vs FUT hair transplants


Reference

Bernstein RM, et al. Physicians Sound Off: FUT vs. FUE. Hair Transplant Forum Intl. 2015; 25(5): 185.


Share this Page






By:
Updated: 2016-05-18 | Published: 2015-10-28







© 2005-2017
, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

ARTAS, ARTAS Hair Studio, and RESTORATION ROBOTICS logo are among the trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Restoration Robotics, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.