Pros & Cons of Follicular Unit Extraction

The following tables summarize the pros and cons of Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE):
| Advantages of FUE |
No linear scar in donor area
|
| Decreased healing time in the donor area |
| No limitations on strenuous exercise after the procedure |
| Less post-op discomfort in the donor area |
Useful for those with a greater risk of donor scarring
|
| Useful for repairing donor scars that cannot be excised |
| Provides an alternative when the scalp is too tight for a strip excision |
Enables one to harvest finer hair from the nape of the neck
|
Makes it theoretically possible to harvest non-scalp hair
|
| Disadvantages of FUE |
Follicular units in FUE are harvested from a much greater area of the donor zone compared to FUT
|
Graft quality is not as good compared to FUT *
|
The maximum follicular unit graft yield is lower than with FUT
|
With each subsequent session, the scarring in FUE is additive
|
In large hair transplant sessions, the entire donor area must be shaved
|
“Capping” *
|
Buried Grafts *
|
Microscopic dissection may be needed in addition to the extraction
|
| After large numbers of grafts are harvested, fine stippled scars may become visible due to thinning of donor area |
Long-term, if the donor area narrows, the scarring may become visible
|
The size of a single session is limited
|
With FUE, grafts are usually out of the body for a longer period of time compared to FUT
|
| FUE is usually more expensive than FUT |









