What is the Difference Between NeoGraft and ARTAS Robotic System for FUE Hair Transplant Surgery?August 17th, 2011
Q: What is the main difference between NeoGraft and the ARTAS™ robotic system? — H.T., Staten Island, NY
A: The Neograft device is basically a powered FUE tool. It is still done by hand and therefore risks operator induced errors and damage to hair follicles. The ARTAS System, made by Restoration Robotics, uses electronic image-based tracking capabilities to map the individual follicular units. It does so to determine the optimal approach for automated graft harvesting. The robotic harvesting device produces consistently high quality grafts and low dissection rates.
- How are Recipient Sites Programmed into the ARTAS Robot?
- Will Robotic FUE Reduce the Cost Per Graft for FUE Procedures?
- How Does the ARTAS Robot Avoid Transection of Hair Follicles During Recipient Site Creation?
- Why is Robotic Recipient Site Creation an Advantage?
- How Does the ARTAS Robotic System Make Recipient Sites in a Hair Transplant?
Topic: Robotic FUE
Tags: ARTAS Robot for FUE, Donor Hair Harvesting, Follicular Unit, Follicular Unit Extraction, Hair Follicle, Hair Follicle Transection, Neograft FUE Machine, Restoration Robotics, Robotics in FUE Posted by Robert M. Bernstein M.D. on August 17th, 2011 at 6:23 pm
If you have any questions or comments please contact us.